Blog Archive
-
▼
2011
(20)
-
▼
October
(6)
- AMAZON KICKS NOOK’S BUTT WITH KINDLE, BUT WHAT ABO...
- WHAT ARE YOU AFRAID OF? EVERYTHING? Celebrate Fear...
- SHIPS AREN'T THE ONLY THINGS BEING LAUNCHED; "THE ...
- To Be a Journalist in 2011? Pew Research Center Re...
- ANNOUNCING: EAGERLY-AWAITED RATINGS FROM 2012 COMP...
- CAN YOU KEEP UP WITH ONLINE TRENDS AND THE ROI POL...
-
▼
October
(6)
About Me
- LEADERHUNTRESS
Followers
Powered by Blogger.
Total Pageviews
Monday, October 31, 2011
AMAZON KICKS NOOK’S BUTT WITH KINDLE, BUT WHAT ABOUT APPLE?
I found this article by David Magee on Linked In-Tools for Publishing, which appeared about a month ago. As the world morphs to digital books – and the smell of a delicious old article moves further and further away from my nose (out of sight, but never ever out of mind), the war wages between B & N with its Nook and Amazon with its Kindle. Here’s what David says:
Ouch, said Barnes & Noble, America's largest bookstore chain which relies heavily on sales of its Nook and Nook Color. Amazon's Fire tablet is $50 cheaper than the Nook Color. Amazon also announced it will slash prices on its.Kindle ereaders
Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos spoke at a news conference during the launch of Amazon's new tablets in New York, September 28, 2011. Amazon.com Inc unveiled its long-awaited tablet computer on Wednesday with a $199 price tag, potentially cheap enough to give Apple Inc's iPad some serious competition for the first time.
Here are five reasons Amazon could drive a nail in Barnes & Noble's coffin:
1) The Nook has arguably saved Barnes & Noblehttp://www.barnesandnoble.com/nook/index.asp, positioning the company well in the digital realm as sales at brick and mortar chain bookstores shrivel. Borders went bankrupt, for instance, because it was too late and too weak with its digital entries. The Nook has sold been solid, and respectable, but it has also been a drag on BN's earnings. Now, BN is forced to slash prices on its Nook products based upon Amazon now having set the pricing bar -- low.
Like us on Facebook
1. BN can't afford to lose money on hardware sales like Amazon can.2) BN has reportedly been moving toward launching its own new tablet, reportedly called "Acclaim." Reports have suggested the product will be priced at $349. But since Amazon has more content, including streaming movies with its Prime subscriptions, it isn't likely that a higher priced tablet will have much of a chance competing against Amazon's lower-priced tablet. So not only will BN have to slash prices on its Nook products, including the Nook Color, but the company may have already lost on the Acclaim before the public has really even heard about the product.
The company can't afford to move backwards, because Chapter 11 is too close behind.
3) BN's online presence was better than what Borders ever had, since Borders was so late into that game. For years, Borders simply let Amazon run its online bookstore before the company launched its own site not long before filing bankruptcy and dissolving. But while bn.com has helped keep BN in business, the website is suddenly getting quite inferior to Amazon.com.
Simply, Amazon.com, and its Prime $79 annual subscription, gets stronger and stronger. The company is adding more content, including recently signed deals for movies and TV shows with CBS and Universal pictures. BN just doesn't have the money to get there. It's a case of the strong getting stronger and the weak getting left behind. As Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos suggested at today's Kindle Fire unveiling, it's about much more than the hardware.
That's true. Amazon has much more. And BN has less in comparison with each and every passing day.
4) BN's big advantage with the Nook is supposedly that it has brick-and-mortar stores throughout the country from which to sell the products. But that's more of a liability than an advantage. It's a costly way to sell digital products, since that real estate is not cheap. Because the company is laden with so much expensive retail real estate it doesn't have the nimbleness in e-products pricing that Amazon does.
5) Amazon's expected mass success with its Kindle Fire tablet -- most observers think Amazon will sell millions of the new product rather quickly -- will only further entrench the company's position as the ebooks leader. Sure, BN hasn't been too far behind, but that gap is likely to grow. And the farther Amazon pulls ahead, the less attractive BN becomes for investors when the company needs to raise capital.
In full disclosure, this isn't a wish that BN will die. The opposite is true. America's needs its largest bookstore chain. It's just that Amazon has just thrown down a competitive gauntlet that BN, already on shaky ground in a slowing book-sales world, simply can't afford. (end of David’s piece).
So, we’re watching all of this. As far as e-books, I was talking with another naysayer last week who tells me e-books are not credible; “they’re sleazy.” I informed him – not true anymore – many are credible, in fact, some top rated authors have benefitted. I will write about this in coming weeks.
As an Apple fan, I always wonder where “IT-The Great Apple” comes in. Obviously, the iPad can do anything better than anyone else.
But apparently, the late, great Steve Jobs said “no Apple e-book” and no one believed him. In an article in Venturebeat.com by Paul Bouton on September 11,
HE reported that IT was reported that Steve Jobs gave New York Times reporter David Pogue an interview. Asked if Apple was ready to debut an e-reader like Amazon’s Kindle — but much, much prettier, of course Jobs said he didn’t think e-readers made sense:
He said Apple doesn’t see e-books as a big market at this time, and also noted that Amazon never says how many Kindles is sells. “Usually, if they sell a lot of something, you want to tell everybody.”
Venturebeat then says, according to input, the Internet’s vote is in: Why believe him(Jobs)? Guardian correspondent Bobbie Johnson unearthed past quotes in which Jobs bluffed on video iPods:
“One of the things we say around Apple, and I paraphrase Bill Clinton from the 1992 presidential race, is ‘It’s about the music, stupid.’ … You can’t watch a video and drive a car. We’re focused on music.”
And in which Jobs’ vice president of iTunes, Eddie Cue, misled readers prior to the iPhone’s debut:
“What we’ve talked about is a something that is valuable for the mass market,” Cue said. “It has to be a phone in the middle-tier of the market, not a $500-tier phone. It has to be very seamless to use.”
VentureBeat says: “
Our guess: Apple will sell a device that reads books and then some. Jobs will explain how it all makes sense. I’ll write a post agreeing with him.”
Back to Melissa aka LeaderHuntress: Unfortunately, Jobs won’t be explaining THAT as predicted but someone else from Apple will; because I think Apple is the top contender. The question is – will people want more than one tablet? Why would someone get a Kindle and an iPad2? It’s a deliver device. I would go with the delivery device that provides the most items for delivery. Or am I missing something? Samsung? Are you there?
Thursday, October 27, 2011
WHAT ARE YOU AFRAID OF? EVERYTHING? Celebrate Fearless Women in Fearful Times (NYC)
When author, speaker and leadership development coach Jacqueline Wales launched her business on living fearlessly six years ago, the economy was still on a twenty-year economic roller coaster - and risks, like gambling on the stock market, seemed like the American thing to do.
Now, Wales says, in this time of economic crisis and fear-driven headlines, courage and risk-taking are not considered an option. Most people now ferociously want to play it safe, yet she finds that risk is essential to survival for many of her clients. They are looking for validation and role models.
“Since 9/11 we have gone from fear to hope to fear, and have become acculturated to the notion that fear is what drives this country,” notes Wales She adds that the race for the next presidential election is fueling the latest fiasco of fear-inducing opinions, together with the continued scares on health care reform, debt, education and many other services that we take for granted. The result is that there are many people who do not have enough information or totally incorrect information, and thus, they fear. “This is how fear functions;” says Wales, “from the un-knowing and from ignorance.”
Wales points to a New York Times article on September 12th 2001 where it was noted that New York could have turned in on itself and become a fortress city, waiting for another attack. But it did not. Instead, it was the collapse of Wall Street’s financial institutions later that sent people into panic. New Yorkers are resilient, and while many have suffered the blows of 9/11 and Wall Street’s shenanigans, one New Yorker who survived 9/11 said it best. “You can’t live in fear. Things happen, and then they don’t happen.”
In 2010, tired of the litany of negativity that spewed forth into our society, Wales decided to bring together a group of women who would celebrate being fearless. She created the first annual Fearless Factor Woman of the Year, and honored Analisa Balares of Womensphere, and Claire Tedesco, a two-time survivor of lymphoblastic leukemia, and a Gold Star New York Girl Scout. (By the way, don't knock the Girl Scouts. Great camping out and the unparalled childhood experience: s'mores!)
At the Second Annual Fearless Factor Woman of the Year being held on November 11, 2011, she is acknowledging that we have reached the 10th anniversary of 9/11, and thus will honor Lena Alhusseini of the Arab American Family Support Center, and Saranne Rothberg of Comedy Cures as this year’s recipients of the awards.
Jacqueline Wales is considered by many to be the ultimate fearless lady. After all, she asks, what can you learn from a former alcoholic, mother of four, and global nomad who earned a black belt in karate at age 49, has written five books, performed in front of thousands of people, and is living her best life now? Her answer…Plenty!
Wales’ unique programs have helped people around the globe develop strong personal success, confident communication and clear visions of their goals. Among her five books, The Fearless Factor, and When the Crow Sings, a semi-autobiographical novel, have become classics in the women’s community.
Wales is the recipient of the National Minority Business Council’s Madame C.J. Walker Leadership Award.
Contact: Jacqueline Wales, Buy your ticket NOW. http://thefearlessfactor2011award.eventbrite.com/
Wednesday, October 19, 2011
SHIPS AREN'T THE ONLY THINGS BEING LAUNCHED; "THE BOOK" ABOUT CRUISING LAUNCHES IN US TODAY!
It's a book: BERLITZ COMPLETE GUIDE TO CRUISING & CRUISE SHIPS 2012
It's the cruise expert - who has spent most of his life on the water: Douglas Ward
It's the 27th edition: the first 26th were effective.
October 19th --it's here. With an App.
Now in its 27th year, the eagerly awaited guide is the only cruise book you need –while the Berlitz Cruise Ships 2012 App provides easy search among 285 ships
Douglas Ward, as always, provides the industry with the list of highest ranking heavy hitters -- which ships are best in class? And then he goes on to reveal, in practical terms, as he provides guidance to all kinds of people -- families, singles, those seeking culture or just some good times, about how to make the best choice for your cruise vacation.
With an economy as turbulent (and unpredictable) as the waves themselves, it's become clear that a cruise vacation is a first choice for Americans watching their finances.
But it's also a first choice for families who want to enjoy vacation time together without having to slave over a hot stove while missing time at the beach. And... cruising has become a top choice, for adventure and luxury, providing trips through exotic waters (like the Amazon and Gambia Rivers), once-in-a-lifetime excursions; and chefs with many stars.
As Americans book cruises in record numbers, the cruise lines work hard to provide fresh choices in salty water, such as more theme cruises, language-specific ships, family reunion and occasion options, and freestyle dining. There are butlers and suites and the Royal Shakespeare Company, orchestras, rap music, so many kinds of bars and grills, and some lines will even pick up your bags from your home and you can find them in your stateroom when you board in another country.
The Complete Guide, filled with lively, no-holds-barred text and vibrant color photos (including maps of principal cruise destinations), is independent and is in no way subsidized by advertising or sponsorship
Cruising has become a very imaginative business. And with Mr. Ward spending up to 200 days a year on the seas researching first-hand what’s best (and worst) in all aspects of cruise travel, we always look forward to his book. He's spent a lifetime sniffing out the new and different, and can tell you at the snap of a finger what's improved, where quality has taken a dive, and which ship has the best selection of delicate pastries.
Simply put, Ward says, the guide provides “a wealth of information and evaluations about the ships, life and services aboard them and how to get the most from the cruising experience.”
If your preference is to “cruise for your cruise” digitally, the Berlitz Cruise Ships app (US $9.99), which has enjoyed high ratings in its first year, allows users to instantly search though the array of cruise ships with just a couple of taps. The 2012 version features an enhanced interface, which helps lead the cruise-goer to his/her best possible cruise match-up, and is loaded with every ship review, current background on cruise lines, ship photos and a new design.
Berlitz Complete Guide to Cruising & Cruise Ships 2012 can be purchased from Barnes & Noble, Amazon, Powells.com, independent bookstores and wherever fine books are sold for $24.99. The Berlitz Cruise Ships 2012 App can be purchased on the iTunes App Store for $9.99.
Feel free to write me - and I'll pass it on to Douglas: what is the most memorable detail of a great cruise experience you ever had? (I'll tell you mine and maybe if we're lucky, Douglas will give you some really interesting anecdotes about his adventures.) He has a great one about Antarctica.
It's the cruise expert - who has spent most of his life on the water: Douglas Ward
It's the 27th edition: the first 26th were effective.
October 19th --it's here. With an App.
Now in its 27th year, the eagerly awaited guide is the only cruise book you need –while the Berlitz Cruise Ships 2012 App provides easy search among 285 ships
Douglas Ward, as always, provides the industry with the list of highest ranking heavy hitters -- which ships are best in class? And then he goes on to reveal, in practical terms, as he provides guidance to all kinds of people -- families, singles, those seeking culture or just some good times, about how to make the best choice for your cruise vacation.
With an economy as turbulent (and unpredictable) as the waves themselves, it's become clear that a cruise vacation is a first choice for Americans watching their finances.
But it's also a first choice for families who want to enjoy vacation time together without having to slave over a hot stove while missing time at the beach. And... cruising has become a top choice, for adventure and luxury, providing trips through exotic waters (like the Amazon and Gambia Rivers), once-in-a-lifetime excursions; and chefs with many stars.
As Americans book cruises in record numbers, the cruise lines work hard to provide fresh choices in salty water, such as more theme cruises, language-specific ships, family reunion and occasion options, and freestyle dining. There are butlers and suites and the Royal Shakespeare Company, orchestras, rap music, so many kinds of bars and grills, and some lines will even pick up your bags from your home and you can find them in your stateroom when you board in another country.
The Complete Guide, filled with lively, no-holds-barred text and vibrant color photos (including maps of principal cruise destinations), is independent and is in no way subsidized by advertising or sponsorship
Cruising has become a very imaginative business. And with Mr. Ward spending up to 200 days a year on the seas researching first-hand what’s best (and worst) in all aspects of cruise travel, we always look forward to his book. He's spent a lifetime sniffing out the new and different, and can tell you at the snap of a finger what's improved, where quality has taken a dive, and which ship has the best selection of delicate pastries.
Simply put, Ward says, the guide provides “a wealth of information and evaluations about the ships, life and services aboard them and how to get the most from the cruising experience.”
If your preference is to “cruise for your cruise” digitally, the Berlitz Cruise Ships app (US $9.99), which has enjoyed high ratings in its first year, allows users to instantly search though the array of cruise ships with just a couple of taps. The 2012 version features an enhanced interface, which helps lead the cruise-goer to his/her best possible cruise match-up, and is loaded with every ship review, current background on cruise lines, ship photos and a new design.
Berlitz Complete Guide to Cruising & Cruise Ships 2012 can be purchased from Barnes & Noble, Amazon, Powells.com, independent bookstores and wherever fine books are sold for $24.99. The Berlitz Cruise Ships 2012 App can be purchased on the iTunes App Store for $9.99.
Feel free to write me - and I'll pass it on to Douglas: what is the most memorable detail of a great cruise experience you ever had? (I'll tell you mine and maybe if we're lucky, Douglas will give you some really interesting anecdotes about his adventures.) He has a great one about Antarctica.
Tuesday, October 4, 2011
To Be a Journalist in 2011? Pew Research Center Reinforces the Frustration in the Profession
I read this in MediaPost and thought it was worth rehashing. Look for my comments in BOLD.
Negative opinions about the performance of news organizations now equal or surpass all-time highs on nine of 12 core measures the Pew Research Center has been tracking since 1985. However, these bleak findings are put into some perspective by the fact that news organizations are more trusted sources of information than are many other institutions, including government and business, says the report. The Pew Research Center for the People & the Press has been tracking views of press performance since 1985, and the overall ratings remain quite negative.
Fully 66% say news stories often are inaccurate, 77% think that news organizations tend to favor one side, and 80% say news organizations are often influenced by powerful people and organizations. (Who is funding the news organizations? Who is buying the ads? That's who owns the media. Ask any reporter worth his/her salt-- it's a slippery slope to do your job.)
The widely-shared belief that news stories are inaccurate cuts to the press's core mission: Just 25% say that in general news organizations get the facts straight while 66% say stories are often inaccurate. As recently as four years ago, 39% said news organizations mostly get the facts straight and 53% said stories are often inaccurate. When you are quoting Thought Leaders who represent political causes who are misrepresenting facts, it's easy to sound like you're incorrect. And when you hire kids out of college for low pay to do your proofreading, you will have lots and lots of typos and inaccuracies. Favoring one side? That is obviously a trend -- we have a polarized nation; thus, we have a polarized press. It's a ratings industry.
Here's a good one.(Or a bad one). The New York Times comes out AFTER Fox. When we're talking quality journalism -- no media can top the New York Times. Natch- I have investigative reporter friends who would argue this -- with evidence. However, it's a personal opinion. From a consumer point of view, I'll never let it go. Who else would dedicate years to covering 9-11 in a such a personal way? Who would assign reporters to explore a story the way they do? The old gray lady deserves respect. I'm surprised NPR and PBS even made the cut. Maybe the dumbing down of the audience is not as bad as it looks....
And the public's impressions of the national media may be influenced more by their opinions of cable news outlets than their views of other news sources, such as network or local TV news, newspapers or internet news outlets. When asked what first comes to mind when they think of "news organizations," most name a cable news outlet, with CNN and Fox News receiving the most mentions by far. I can understand CNN coming to mind- Ted Turner did a brilliant job of building an Everyman's news organization. But Fox? Pew: tell us how much of their material is correct. Or does Michael Moore have to do it?
Fully 66% say news stories often are inaccurate, 77% think that news organizations tend to favor one side, and 80% say news organizations are often influenced by powerful people and organizations. (Who is funding the news organizations? Who is buying the ads? That's who owns the media. Ask any reporter worth his/her salt-- it's a slippery slope to do your job.)
The widely-shared belief that news stories are inaccurate cuts to the press's core mission: Just 25% say that in general news organizations get the facts straight while 66% say stories are often inaccurate. As recently as four years ago, 39% said news organizations mostly get the facts straight and 53% said stories are often inaccurate. When you are quoting Thought Leaders who represent political causes who are misrepresenting facts, it's easy to sound like you're incorrect. And when you hire kids out of college for low pay to do your proofreading, you will have lots and lots of typos and inaccuracies. Favoring one side? That is obviously a trend -- we have a polarized nation; thus, we have a polarized press. It's a ratings industry.
Evaluations of Overall Press Performance (% of Respondents) | ||
1985 | 2011 | |
Stories often inaccurate | 34% | 66% |
Tend to favor one side | 53 | 77 |
Often influenced by powerful people and organizations | 53 | 80 |
Source: Pew Research Center, July 2011 |
Here's a good one.(Or a bad one). The New York Times comes out AFTER Fox. When we're talking quality journalism -- no media can top the New York Times. Natch- I have investigative reporter friends who would argue this -- with evidence. However, it's a personal opinion. From a consumer point of view, I'll never let it go. Who else would dedicate years to covering 9-11 in a such a personal way? Who would assign reporters to explore a story the way they do? The old gray lady deserves respect. I'm surprised NPR and PBS even made the cut. Maybe the dumbing down of the audience is not as bad as it looks....
And the public's impressions of the national media may be influenced more by their opinions of cable news outlets than their views of other news sources, such as network or local TV news, newspapers or internet news outlets. When asked what first comes to mind when they think of "news organizations," most name a cable news outlet, with CNN and Fox News receiving the most mentions by far. I can understand CNN coming to mind- Ted Turner did a brilliant job of building an Everyman's news organization. But Fox? Pew: tell us how much of their material is correct. Or does Michael Moore have to do it?
Most Named News Organization Sources (% of Respondents) | |
Source "comes to mind" | % of Respondents |
CNN | 43% |
Fox News | 39 |
NBC News | 18 |
ABC News | 16 |
CBS News | 12 |
MSNBC | 12 |
New York Times | 4 |
NPR | 3 |
AP | 3 |
CNBC | 1 |
WSJ | 1 |
USA Today | 1 |
PBS | 1 |
Categories | |
Cable News | 63 |
Network TV News | 36 |
Local TV News | 10 |
National newspaper | 5 |
Local newspaper | 4 |
Website | 3 |
Source: Pew Research Center, July 2011(Multiple response OK) |
Monday, October 3, 2011
ANNOUNCING: EAGERLY-AWAITED RATINGS FROM 2012 COMPLETE GUIDE TO CRUISING & CRUISE SHIPS
Renowned Expert Douglas Ward Scores Almost Every Cruise Ship on the High Seas in Several Categories
The 2012 Winners ….
NEW YORK, NY, October, 2011 – It is the cruise industry’s version of the Oscars, Emmys and Tonys all rolled into one - renowned cruise expert Douglas Ward’s much-anticipated ratings of 285 ships in 2012 Berlitz Complete Guide to Cruising & Cruise Ships (release date: Oct 19, 2011)
For the 27th year, Ward—who, to date, has spent some 5,700 days at sea and taken more than 1,000 cruises--bases his meticulous ratings on criteria that includes each ship’s accommodations, food, service, entertainment, cleanliness, excursions and general value for the passenger. “Despite constant cruise-company claims that theirs has been named the ‘Best Cruise Line’ or ‘Best Cruise Ship’, there really is no such thing, Ward writes. “Only what’s right for you. My comprehensive ratings system, compiled totally independently and in no way subsidized by advertising or sponsorship, bases its Berlitz stars on points given in numerous categories. They all add up to what remains an unbiased and unvarnished appraisal of what’s best and worst in the world of cruising.”
Because ships change in quality, and new ships are launched and some are retired or rerouted, Ward has made it his life’s work to carefully follow these changes, and report on them. For families eager to take advantage of cruising’s outstanding value next summer, Ward advises them to look no further than the Mediterranean and Northern Europe where he forecasts areas of overcapacity, leading to still greater discounts than we’ve seen previously. With family cruising the biggest growth area, the large resort ships have responded by introducing more and better children’s facilities.
In the Berlitz Complete Guide to Cruising & Cruise Ships 2012, Ward names the top-rating ships for 2012, with the 10 most highly rated being officially ‘small’ or ‘boutique’, and explains why they scored as highly as they did. Europa, a ‘Small Ship’ of Hapag Lloyd Cruises, has earned top honors for the 12th consecutive year and is once again the only vessel to be placed in the exclusive 5-star Plus ‘club’. Seabourn’s ships scoop a remarkable 6 of the ten, while SeaDream grabs the top 2 slots in the Boutique Ships category.
The Rankings
Top 3 Ships in each category – Points out of 2,000
Large (Resort) Ships (over 1,600 passengers)
1st Place Queen Mary 2 (Grill Class) 1,702 points
2nd Place Queen Elizabeth (Grill Class) 1,690 points
3rd Place Queen Victoria (Grill Class) 1,671 points
Mid-Size Ships (600 – 1,600 passengers)
1st Place Crystal Serenity 1,717 points
Joint 2nd Place Crystal Symphony and Marina 1,701 points
Small Ships (200 – 600 passengers)
1st Place Europa 1,852 points
2nd Place Seabourn Quest 1,787 points
3rd Place Seabourn Odyssey 1,786 points
Boutique Ships (50 – 200 passengers)
1st Place SeaDream II 1,788 points
2nd Place SeaDream I 1,786 points
3rd Place Hanseatic 1,746 points
Commenting on Europa’s remarkable consistent highest ratings, Ward says, “Although Europa is now 12 years old, it continues to score the most points with 1,852 out of a possible 2,000 points. The only ship to have a 3-star Michelin chef on board for most of the year, Europa is a classic that has stood the test of time, and looks almost new, thanks to the dedication of its crew and owners. However, there are movers in the ranks too, with ships going both up and down in star rating, to reflect the changes in service or staff training.”
Fully updated and revised and now in its 27th year, the Berlitz Complete Guide to Cruising & Cruise Ships 2012, will be available October 19, 2011 (688 pages, $24.99) and can be purchased from Barnes & Noble, Amazon, Powells.com, and wherever fine books are sold. The Berlitz Cruise Ships 2012 App can be purchased on the iTunes App Store for US ($9.99), and can be used with the iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch. It allows cruise-goers to quickly search through all 285 ships according to their needs, whether for family travel, cuisine, accommodation, size of ship and many other criteria.
The World’s Top Authority on Cruising and Cruise Ships
When it comes to life on the ocean waves, Ward is the world’s top authority on cruising and cruise ships, with more than 45 years of experience. He continues to spend up to 200 days a year aboard cruise ships, inspecting and evaluating their facilities. The cruise industry consists of more than 70 ocean going cruise ship operators carrying over 21 million passengers a year. Although the choice can be almost overwhelming, this new Guide will help readers identify the X-factor - that special quality that makes a ship stand out for them. What is that quality? According to Ward, “Details. Details. Details.”
###
MEDIA CONTACT: Melissa Lande, mlande@landepr.com
CAN YOU KEEP UP WITH ONLINE TRENDS AND THE ROI POLICE?
Well, the OMMA Show a couple of weeks ago seemed more lethargic than last year's show at the same time-- Where was Arianna Huffington now that we needed her? She linked new trends to content -- and her thoughts were compelling. This year everything was about the ever-evolving way to find the right customers through algorithmics.(Is that like Al Gore-rithmics?)
So now, it's all sounding very technical and you have to multi-juggle your networks. If you do Facebook, you have to do Google+, and Linked In. And kits more. This day-to-day madness, even worse, is well-initiated madness, which means there are a lot of smart thinkers to catch up on- and you will inevitably spend time learning what you don't need to get to that which you do.
"In the few days since I was invited to write this, Google+ went public, Facebook announced Timeline, Amazon debuted its tablet, Fire, and its cloud-based browser, Silk, and the IAB reported ad spending on the Internet grew by 23% in the first half of 2011 compared to last year. The pace and scale of change in media we are witnessing is difficult to fathom, much less summarize in a few hundred words."
He highlights the trends - which we saw at OMMA - this way:
More media fragmentation. How many ways can you watch your favorite TV show? Pirated, DVD, DVR, streaming, VOD, downloaded to mobile, tablet, and on and on. And, oh right, broadcast. The landscape of media is undergoing radical, frenetic change. And beyond an explosion of new technological channels for consuming professionally produced media, a sea-change is the increasing popularity (and competition for professional media makers) of amateur social content, such as blogs, Twitter, homemade YouTube videos, Facebook and so on. This trend will continue. A limited counterbalancing trend is media aggregation platforms, such Facebook, where people browse media from all those channels in one spot. But the main impact for marketers is more work required on the part of media buyers combined with more technology attempting to reaggregate audiences, such as advertising exchanges. Complexity reigns for the foreseeable future in targeting audiences for appropriate brand messages.
More intelligent personalization. Facebook, FlipBoard and Amazon (both as a marketing and in the form of its new Silk browser) are all good examples of how media companies and marketers are harnessing knowledge about people's interests, based on algorithmic analysis of digital media and shopping data exhaust, to better customize unique and hyper-relevant experiences for media consumers. Expect this to continue. The next most powerful shift we should expect is services able to aggregated such data from across siloed data stores presently to improve knowledge of people's tastes across media and shopping experiences. Imagine a service that mashed-up everything Facebook knows about your tastes with everything Amazon does, plus your account info from NetFlix, iTunes, Pandora/Spotify/LastFM, Yelp, IMDB and so on. Rather than hoarding this knowledge in secret for use only in behavioral targeted advertising, a winning service will deliver this as a direct user experience, with superior recommendations for a range of consumer desires.
Advertisers will become "ROI Managers, managing ROI against sales impact. Advertisers are only beginning to get the upper hand on the blizzard of data generated by all of the new media and marketing systems that drive consumers' lives today. Mostly those programs remain disconnected and reactive. Winning marketers of tomorrow will excel at changing their perspective on ROI from simple campaign measurement to iterative, integrated, cross-channel management. At the heart of succeeding in that transition will be spend-to-impact analysis across and among marketing programs, providing an equalized basis for evaluating the impact of every marketing investment from television to direct mail to billboards to search advertising to social media programs.
To this last issue, my fave Social Media expert, Steve Goldner, aka Social Steve, says:
"For the better part of two years, I have been suggesting the importance of the social media marketing funnel within social media. Today, I am here to say it has past its relevance. Key issues are 'sales' and 'ROI'. A marketing funnel has always had a 'sales' stage. I am suggesting that sales NOT be something that is measured for social media. Thus we should not look for social media ROI, but rather social media ROE (return of engagement).
This is not another loose definition of measuring the relevance of social media for business, but rather I provide some concrete parameters that really show a return to the business. Check out his article, “Social Media Model that Defines the End of the World as We Know It” at http://wp.me/pxjrG-k5 and add your thoughts."
What Steve is saying reminds me of how some clients view PR activities as they are practiced through traditional media placements (and now, social media). Small-to-mid sized companies want sales from PR. Corporate communications wants ROI based on reports generated by companies like Cision that have complicated dashboards that measure how much a company is talked about -- where the article appeared-- how many words etc.
There are two things wrong with this:
1. A company's customer may be talking about his/her experience and refer to that company once in a front page article of say, The Wall Street Journal. Cision will weigh the value of that article (which was generated behind the scenes by the PR company) based on the client being mentioned only once -- and the article not being fully about that company. In fact, getting a third party endorsement from a customer in print is the most valuable PR any company can receive. It's real life anecdotes that engage readers' interest and build Reputation and Influence for the client.
2. If some of the most credible, hard-working journalists were aware that their articles are being referenced and rated in ROI shekels, they would not be too happy. As a PR person and sometimes journalist, I always thought this was not only an inefficient way to rate the value of placements, it's also not smart. It means putting CONTENT AND ENGAGEMENT in a numerical system --- and what comes out the other end is garbage.
Yes, I know you need SOMETHING, but I would judge an article by its LEVEL OF ENGAGEMENT AND INFLUENCE, much as Steve has suggested for social media. The same principle applies to traditional media placements.
Labels:
online trends,
Traditional Media
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)